Overview
in this document, I'll walk you through the development of the Jargonator library, a Go-based HTTP server that translates between plain English and exaggerated corporate jargon using OpenAI's API. While the functionality may seem straightforward, the design decisions and architecture show how to build a reusable, maintainable library that other developers can easily integrate into their apps
(disclaimer: this project is solely built for my http server learning purpose only)
Business Context
Corporate communication (at least from my experience) often suffers from:
- Excessive jargon that obscures simple ideas
- Unnecessarily complex language that reduces clarity
- Verbosity that wastes time and reduces engagement
Simultaneously, plain language can sometimes lack the authoritative tone expected in business settings.
Goal: Build a library that provides a humorous yet practical API for translating between plain English and corporate jargon, allowing developers to integrate this functionality into their own applications, chatbots, or tools.
Technical Architecture
I've adopted a modular, interface-driven design that follows Clean Architecture principles for several reasons:
Separation of Concerns
each component in the library has a single responsibility:
- OpenAI Client: interfaces with the OpenAI API
- Prompter: Constructs specialized prompts for translations
- Translation Service: Orchestrates between Prompter and OpenAI Client
- HTTP Handlers: manages HTTP input/output
- Server: Ties everything together with configuration
this clear separation makes the code easier to understand, test, and extend (hopefully)
Technical Decision: Interface-Based Design
Pros:
- compponents can be mocked easily for testing
- implementation details can change without affecting dependent components
- Users can provide custom implementations for specific needs
- Clean dependency direction from outer layers to inner layers
Cons:
- Introduce more abstraction than might be needed for simple use cases
- more verbose code with interfaces and implementations
- can be over-engineered for small applications
- May create a minor learning curve for new developers like myself
I chose this approach because the benefits of testability and extensibility outweighed the costs of additional abstractions, especially given the need for mocking the OpenAI API during development and testing.
Folder Structure
jargonatorlib/
├── config.go # Configuration struct and validation
├── jargonator.go # Main library entry points (Server struct, Start/Shutdown)
├── handlers/
│ └── translate.go # HTTP handlers for /to-jargon and /to-plain
├── translation/
│ ├── service.go # Core translation logic
│ ├── prompter.go # Prompt generation for OpenAI
│ ├── openai_api.go # OpenAI API implementation
│ └── openai_client.go # OpenAI client with validation
└── examples/
└── simple-server/ # Example server implementation
Code Overview
Configuration (Config)
type Config struct {
Port string
OpenAIAPIKey string
OpenAIModel string
RequestTimeoutSeconds int
}
Technical Decision: Configuration Struct with Validation
Pros:
- centralize all configuration in one place
- Validates configuration early to fail fast
- type safety compared to environment variables
Cons:
- More structured than simple environment variables
- requires more code than direct access to environment
- again, another layer for simple configurations
- Requires validation maintenance when adding fields
I chose this approach for its robustness and type safety, especially when handling critical configuration like API keys and timeouts.
Server Component
type Server struct {
config Config
httpServer *http.Server
}
func NewServer(cfg Config) (*Server, error)
func (s *Server) Start() error
func (s *Server) Shutdown(ctx context.Context) error
Technical Decision: Using Standard http.Server
Pros:
- Leverages Go's standard library
- Well understood by Go developers
- No external dependencies
- Provides graceful shutdown capabilities
Cons:
- less feature rich than frameworks like Gin
- Requires more boilerplate for advanced features
- Manual routing setup
- No built-in middleware system
Translation Service
type Service struct {
client OpenAIClient
prompter PrompterInterface
model string
}
func (s *Service) TranslateToJargon(text string) (string, error)
func (s *Service) TranslateToPlain(text string) (string, error)
Technical Decision: Specialized Prompter Component
Pros:
- Separates prompt engineering from API interaction
- Allows prompt refinement without changing other components
- Makes the translation "personality" configurable
- Isolates the creative aspect of the system
Cons:
- Additional abstraction for a relatively simple operation
- could be considered overengineering for basic prompting
- Requires maintenance of prompt templates
The Prompter component was deemed essential because the quality of the translations depends heavily on well-crafted prompts, and this design allows prompt improvements without affecting the rest of the system.
OpenAI Client
type OpenAIClientImpl struct {
api OpenAIAPI
}
func (c *OpenAIClientImpl) GetCompletion(prompt string, model string) (string, error)
Technical Decision: Official OpenAI Client vs. Custom Implementation
Pros of Official Client:
- maintaned by OpenAI and its commmunity
- Automatic updates for API changes
- Proper error handling
- Type safety for requests/responses
Cons of Official Client:
- Additional dependency
- Version compatibility concerns
I chose the official OpenAI client for its reliability, maintenance, and proper handling of things.
Running the Project
Build
go build -o jargon-server ./examples/simple-server
Run Example Server
export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-openai-api-key"
./jargon-server
Test
go test ./...
Conclusion
The Jargonator lib demonstrates how even a simple functionality can benefit from thoughtful architecture. by following clean architecture principles, using interface-based design, and employing TDD, we've created a maintainable library that:
- is thoroughly tested at all levels
- Can be easily extended or modified
- Separates concerns for better maintainability
the project successfully fulfills its goal of providing a humorous yet practical tool for translating between plain English and corporate jargon, packaged as a library that other developers can easily integrate into their app.
view and clone the full project here: GitHub Repository — Jargonator